Back to Podcast Digest
How I AI25m

I benchmarked the NEW Sonnet 5. The results shocked me.

TL;DR

  • Sonnet 5 underperformed expectations in blind testing, landing second-to-last in the creator's personal ranking despite Anthropic's claims of near-Opus performance at lower cost.

  • Gemini 3 Pro unexpectedly topped the AI-judged leaderboard, tied with Sonnet 5, surprising the creator who had forgotten Gemini was even in the test set.

  • Human taste diverged sharply from AI judges, with the creator preferring Sonnet 4.6 while AI judges scored it poorly, revealing that automated evals miss qualitative "vibe" factors.

  • Different models excel at different tasks, with GPT 5.5 recommended for PRDs, Sonnet 4.6 for prototyping and conversation, and Opus 4.8 for complex UI work.

  • The benchmark cost roughly $2 per million input tokens at launch pricing, making it affordable to run comprehensive evals before prices increase after summer.

Summary

Claude Sonnet 5 landed at the bottom of a blind taste test ranking, beaten by Sonnet 4.6, Gemini 3 Pro, and GPT 5.5 in the creator's own benchmark. The How I AI bench revealed a striking split between AI judges and human taste, with models agreeing on quality but the human preferring completely different outputs.

Was This Useful?

Share